Wildlife or historical interpretation – which is easier?

The grass does always look greener on the other side of the track.

When I train wildlife interpreters they frequently complain that historical interpretation is so much easier because of ‘all those stories and characters that you have to work with’.  Well, yes, that’s true …

Whereas historical interpreters moan that the wildlife interpreters have the more appealing option because ‘everyone one loves nature and we just have boring old buildings and ruins’. Maybe that’s true too.

Max has accurately identified the greenest grass. Usually it is harder than this.

My trainer’s answer is, of course, to encourage folk to focus on the strengths of their own situation – and quit whingeing!

Nonetheless, as someone who works happily on both sides, I think they are different.  Both are equally green and fertile with opportunity – but the opportunities bloom differently.

Bluebells and primroses also bloom differently – but equally effectively, beautifully and valuably.

Here I am going to think about interpretelling at historical sites and in a later blog I will talk about natural and wildlife sites.

The idea of interpretelling applies easily to human heritage. The analogy and application of storytelling fits easily.  When we are looking for examples of the power of narrative and narration, the examples we first think of are often from historical sites. History after all, seems intuitively to be about stories and how and why we tell them.

We can understand that storytelling is, and always has been, a means of transmitting knowledge and meaning from one generation to another. This becomes more and more important as our collective knowledge bank becomes ever larger and more complex.

Large businesses began to look closely at storytelling not because of its relevance to branding and identity but because of its potential in ‘knowledge management’. Corporations need to ensure that the legacy of learning remains within the company.  It needs to be passed on, when teams disperse or individuals, so that each generation does not reinvent the wheel.

Historians emphasise the importance of their discipline for the same reasons; it gives us at least a chance of not repeating our mistakes. Telling the stories of the past, weaving history into our heritage, teasing out the meaning is a well-trodden path. The value and cultural importance of heritage interpretation is clear.

The challenge for the interpretive relater of history is to make all that rewarding to a visitor at a place. Or, more accurately, to a range of visitors at a place. Even more accurately, to a range of visitors with difference knowledge, interests, presumptions, biases and motivations. Often to do all that without being able to speak directly to the visitors.

I believe, the challenge for interpretelling history is in taking notice of that context and what it means.  Which is simply that you cannot tell the whole story.  That would take a book.  Indeed, you will often find it already has. It may be a weighty highly researched academic tome or it may be a, possibly differently researched historical novel.  You may well need to read them, but you cannot write them.  You have to fillet them. Strip them back to the bare bones, to the main characters and incidents. To the nub of the drama,  and significance, the tension and resolution, the conflict or the point of decision.

The Story of the Battle of Bosworth at its most simple – a rather extreme example.

I understand that this is murder for many historians. It feels like ‘dumbing down’, watering down, impoverishing the tale. I sympathise to a point, but it is necessary. There are short, medium and long versions of all stories and good tellers will find them as needed. And at the heart of the history there are people doing remarkable, exotic, familiar, long lost, incomprehensible, understandable stuff.  It makes a great short story.

Things may be trickier, subtler when communicating about our natural heritage.

About susancrosstelltale

Great visits to heritage and natural sites do not happen by accident. This blog is about the work that make special sites great places to visit. I hope it will be useful to visitors and host alike. Find out more at me and my blog.
This entry was posted in Historical interpretation, Interpretation, Interpretelling, Storytelling, Tips and advice, Training, Wildlife interpretation and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Wildlife or historical interpretation – which is easier?

  1. Pingback: Why wildlife interpretation is harder work than historical interpretation - TellTale

  2. Pingback: Warning - wildlife interpretation can be even harder than I said last time - TellTale

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s